Comparing Utilitarian and Hedonic Usefulness to User Intention in Multipurpose Information Systems

Cited 39 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
  • Hit : 442
  • Download : 0
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGu J.-C.ko
dc.contributor.authorFan L.ko
dc.contributor.authorSuh Y.H.ko
dc.contributor.authorLee S.-C.ko
dc.date.accessioned2013-03-08T18:41:28Z-
dc.date.available2013-03-08T18:41:28Z-
dc.date.created2012-02-06-
dc.date.created2012-02-06-
dc.date.issued2010-
dc.identifier.citationCYBERPSYCHOLOGY BEHAVIOR AND SOCIAL NETWORKING, v.13, no.3, pp.287 - 297-
dc.identifier.issn2152-2715-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10203/93938-
dc.description.abstractThis research studies the differences between productivity-oriented (or utilitarian) and entertainment-oriented (or hedonic) usefulness for a multipurpose information system in user acceptance models, as information systems can be high or low in both hedonic and utilitarian attributes. Accordingly, perceived usefulness (PU) is divided into perceived utilitarian usefulness (PUU) and perceived hedonic usefulness (PHU) to provide a better understanding of users' intention for accepting IT. To test the proposed model more effectively, this research targets instant messaging (IM), which is an extremely popular and increasingly important communication system, both utilitarian and hedonic in nature. This research compares the difference across two groups: students for hedonic purpose and employees for utilitarian purpose. We conclude that the proposed model, which distinguishes between utilitarian and hedonic usefulness, is more effective than previous models in which the usefulness was not distinguished. Both PUU and PHU have an effect on intention to use. Employees consider PUU more important in their intention to use IM, while students are more influenced by PHU.-
dc.languageEnglish-
dc.publisherMARY ANN LIEBERT INC-
dc.subjectTECHNOLOGY ACCEPTANCE MODEL-
dc.subjectPERCEIVED USEFULNESS-
dc.subjectMEASUREMENT EQUIVALENCE-
dc.subjectINTRINSIC MOTIVATION-
dc.subjectCOGNITIVE ABSORPTION-
dc.subjectONLINE-
dc.subjectUSAGE-
dc.subjectTAM-
dc.subjectCONSUMPTION-
dc.subjectEXPERIENCE-
dc.titleComparing Utilitarian and Hedonic Usefulness to User Intention in Multipurpose Information Systems-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.wosid000278872900008-
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-77955597997-
dc.type.rimsART-
dc.citation.volume13-
dc.citation.issue3-
dc.citation.beginningpage287-
dc.citation.endingpage297-
dc.citation.publicationnameCYBERPSYCHOLOGY BEHAVIOR AND SOCIAL NETWORKING-
dc.identifier.doi10.1089/cyber.2009.0167-
dc.contributor.localauthorGu J.-C.-
dc.contributor.nonIdAuthorFan L.-
dc.contributor.nonIdAuthorSuh Y.H.-
dc.contributor.nonIdAuthorLee S.-C.-
dc.type.journalArticleArticle-
dc.subject.keywordPlusTECHNOLOGY ACCEPTANCE MODEL-
dc.subject.keywordPlusPERCEIVED USEFULNESS-
dc.subject.keywordPlusMEASUREMENT EQUIVALENCE-
dc.subject.keywordPlusINTRINSIC MOTIVATION-
dc.subject.keywordPlusCOGNITIVE ABSORPTION-
dc.subject.keywordPlusONLINE-
dc.subject.keywordPlusUSAGE-
dc.subject.keywordPlusTAM-
dc.subject.keywordPlusCONSUMPTION-
dc.subject.keywordPlusEXPERIENCE-
Appears in Collection
RIMS Journal Papers
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
This item is cited by other documents in WoS
⊙ Detail Information in WoSⓡ Click to see webofscience_button
⊙ Cited 39 items in WoS Click to see citing articles in records_button

qr_code

  • mendeley

    citeulike


rss_1.0 rss_2.0 atom_1.0