Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Patients With Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation and Low Body Weight

Cited 68 time in webofscience Cited 49 time in scopus
  • Hit : 155
  • Download : 76
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLee, So-Ryoungko
dc.contributor.authorChoi, Eue-Keunko
dc.contributor.authorPark, Chan Soonko
dc.contributor.authorHan, Kyung-Doko
dc.contributor.authorJung, Jin-Hyungko
dc.contributor.authorOh, Seilko
dc.contributor.authorLip, Gregory Y. H.ko
dc.date.accessioned2019-04-15T14:30:41Z-
dc.date.available2019-04-15T14:30:41Z-
dc.date.created2019-03-18-
dc.date.created2019-03-18-
dc.date.issued2019-03-
dc.identifier.citationJOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, v.73, no.8, pp.919 - 931-
dc.identifier.issn0735-1097-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10203/254119-
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND It is unclear whether the overall effectiveness and safety of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are consistent in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (AF) and extremely low body weight (<50 kg). OBJECTIVES This study compared DOACs with warfarin in AF patients with low body weight. METHODS Using data from the Korean National Health Insurance Service database from January 2014 to December 2016, AF patients with body weight <= 60 kg and who were treated with oral anticoagulants (n = 14,013 taking DOACs and n = 7,576 taking warfarin) were included and examined for ischemic stroke, intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), gastrointestinal bleeding, major bleeding, all-cause death, and composite outcome. The propensity score weighting was used to balance the 2 groups. RESULTS Baseline characteristics were well balanced between the 2 groups (mean age 73 years, mean CHA(2)DS(2)-VASc score 4, and 28% of patients weighed <50 kg). DOACs were associated with lower risks of ischemic stroke (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.591; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.510 to 0.686) and major bleeding (HR: 0.705; 95%: CI 0.601 to 0.825), which were caused by a reduction in ICH (HR: 0.554; 95% CI: 0.429 to 0.713) compared with warfarin. DOAC improved the net clinical benefit compared with warfarin (HR for composite outcome: 0.660; 95% CI: 0.606 to 0.717), and this was consistent in patients who weighed <50 kg (HR for composite outcome: 0.665; 95% CI: 0.581 to 0.762). CONCLUSIONS In this real-world Asian AF population with low body weight, DOACs showed better effectiveness and safety than warfarin. These results were consistent in patients with extremely low body weight. Regular dosages of DOACs showed comparable results as reduced dosages of DOACs in both effectiveness and safety. (c) 2019 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.-
dc.languageEnglish-
dc.publisherELSEVIER SCIENCE INC-
dc.titleDirect Oral Anticoagulants in Patients With Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation and Low Body Weight-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.wosid000459872000007-
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-85061576526-
dc.type.rimsART-
dc.citation.volume73-
dc.citation.issue8-
dc.citation.beginningpage919-
dc.citation.endingpage931-
dc.citation.publicationnameJOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jacc.2018.11.051-
dc.contributor.nonIdAuthorLee, So-Ryoung-
dc.contributor.nonIdAuthorChoi, Eue-Keun-
dc.contributor.nonIdAuthorHan, Kyung-Do-
dc.contributor.nonIdAuthorJung, Jin-Hyung-
dc.contributor.nonIdAuthorOh, Seil-
dc.contributor.nonIdAuthorLip, Gregory Y. H.-
dc.description.isOpenAccessY-
dc.type.journalArticleArticle-
dc.subject.keywordAuthoratrial fibrillation-
dc.subject.keywordAuthordirect oral anticoagulant-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorlow body weight-
dc.subject.keywordAuthornonvitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorwarfarin-
dc.subject.keywordPlusPROPENSITY SCORE METHODS-
dc.subject.keywordPlusSTROKE PREVENTION-
dc.subject.keywordPlusASIAN PATIENTS-
dc.subject.keywordPlusWARFARIN-
dc.subject.keywordPlusSAFETY-
dc.subject.keywordPlusRISK-
dc.subject.keywordPlusDABIGATRAN-
dc.subject.keywordPlusAPIXABAN-
dc.subject.keywordPlusOUTCOMES-
dc.subject.keywordPlusPHARMACOKINETICS-
Appears in Collection
Files in This Item
108764.pdf(704.84 kB)Download
This item is cited by other documents in WoS
⊙ Detail Information in WoSⓡ Click to see webofscience_button
⊙ Cited 68 items in WoS Click to see citing articles in records_button

qr_code

  • mendeley

    citeulike


rss_1.0 rss_2.0 atom_1.0