Microneedle and mucosal delivery of influenza vaccines

Cited 30 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
  • Hit : 408
  • Download : 0
In recent years with the threat of pandemic influenza and other public health needs, alternative vaccination methods other than intramuscular immunization have received great attention. The skin and mucosal surfaces are attractive sites probably because of both noninvasive access to the vaccine delivery and unique immunological responses. Intradermal vaccines using a microinjection system (BD Soluvia (TM)) and intranasal vaccines (FluMist (R)) are licensed. As a new vaccination method, solid microneedles have been developed using a simple device that may be suitable for self-administration. Because coated microneedle influenza vaccines are administered in the solid state, developing formulations maintaining the stability of influenza vaccines is an important issue to be considered. Marketable microneedle devices and clinical trials remain to be developed. Other alternative mucosal routes such as oral and intranasal delivery systems are also attractive for inducing cross-protective mucosal immunity, but effective non-live mucosal vaccines remain to be developed.
Publisher
EXPERT REVIEWS
Issue Date
2012-05
Language
English
Article Type
Article
Keywords

VIRUS-LIKE PARTICLES; TRANSDERMAL DRUG-DELIVERY; EPIDERMAL POWDER IMMUNIZATION; MURINE RESPIRATORY-TRACT; SKIN DENDRITIC CELLS; HEAT-LABILE TOXIN; ANTIBODY-RESPONSES; IMMUNE-RESPONSES; TRANSCUTANEOUS IMMUNIZATION; SEASONAL INFLUENZA

Citation

EXPERT REVIEW OF VACCINES, v.11, no.5, pp.547 - 560

ISSN
1476-0584
DOI
10.1586/ERV.12.25
URI
http://hdl.handle.net/10203/102098
Appears in Collection
CBE-Journal Papers(저널논문)
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
This item is cited by other documents in WoS
⊙ Detail Information in WoSⓡ Click to see webofscience_button
⊙ Cited 30 items in WoS Click to see citing articles in records_button

qr_code

  • mendeley

    citeulike


rss_1.0 rss_2.0 atom_1.0