Roll rotation cues influence roll tilt perception assayed using a somatosensory technique

Cited 21 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
  • Hit : 948
  • Download : 7
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorPark, Sukyungko
dc.contributor.authorGianna-Poulin, Cko
dc.contributor.authorBlack, FOko
dc.contributor.authorWood, Sko
dc.contributor.authorMerfeld, DMko
dc.date.accessioned2008-04-17T07:56:12Z-
dc.date.available2008-04-17T07:56:12Z-
dc.date.created2012-02-06-
dc.date.created2012-02-06-
dc.date.issued2006-07-
dc.identifier.citationJOURNAL OF NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, v.96, no.1, pp.486 - 491-
dc.identifier.issn0022-3077-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10203/3945-
dc.descriptionThe authors thank T. Bennett and V. Stallings for technical contributions, M. Marsden and P. Cunningham for administrative assistance, and Drs. Lionel Zupan and Rick Lewis for commenting on early versions of the manuscript. Experiments were performed at the Legacy Neurotology Research Laboratory.en
dc.description.abstractWe investigated how the nervous system processes ambiguous cues from the otolith organs by measuring roll tilt perception elicited by two motion paradigms. In one paradigm ( tilt), eight subjects were sinusoidally tilted in roll with the axis of rotation near ear level. Stimulus frequencies ranged from 0.005 to 0.7 Hz, and the peak amplitude of tilt was 20. During this paradigm, subjects experienced a sinusoidal variation of interaural gravitational force with a peak of 0.34 g. The second motion paradigm ( translation) was designed to yield the same sinusoidal variation in interaural force but did not include a roll canal cue. This was achieved by sinusoidally translating the subjects along their interaural axis. For the 0.7-Hz translation trial, the subjects were simply translated from side to side. A centrifuge was used for the 0.005- to 0.5-Hz translation trials; the subjects were rotated in yaw at 250 degrees/s for 5 min before initiating sinusoidal translations yielding an interaural otolith stimulus composed of both centrifugal and radial acceleration. Using a somatosensory task to measure roll tilt perception, we found substantial differences in tilt perception during the two motion paradigms. Because the primary difference between the two motion paradigms was the presence of roll canal cues during roll tilt trials, these perceptual differences suggest that canal cues influence tilt perception. Specifically, rotational cues provided by the semicircular canals help the CNS resolve ambiguous otolith cues during head tilt, yielding more accurate tilt perception.-
dc.description.sponsorshipThe authors acknowledge support from National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders Grants DC-004158 to D. M. Merfeld and S. Park and DC-00205 to C. Gianna-Poulin, S. Wood, and F. O. Black as well as National Aeronautics and Space Administration Grant NAW9-1254 to F. O. Black.en
dc.languageEnglish-
dc.language.isoen_USen
dc.publisherAMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC-
dc.subjectQUALITATIVELY DIFFERENT MECHANISMS-
dc.subjectPERCEIVED BODY POSITION-
dc.subjectGRAVITO-INERTIAL CUES-
dc.subjectLINEAR ACCELERATION-
dc.subjectECCENTRIC ROTATION-
dc.subjectSQUIRREL-MONKEY-
dc.subjectVESTIBULOOCULAR REFLEX-
dc.subjectVESTIBULAR PERCEPTION-
dc.subjectOCULOGRAVIC ILLUSION-
dc.subjectOCULAR TORSION-
dc.titleRoll rotation cues influence roll tilt perception assayed using a somatosensory technique-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.wosid000238262400044-
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-33745756538-
dc.type.rimsART-
dc.citation.volume96-
dc.citation.issue1-
dc.citation.beginningpage486-
dc.citation.endingpage491-
dc.citation.publicationnameJOURNAL OF NEUROPHYSIOLOGY-
dc.identifier.doi10.1152/jn.01163.2005-
dc.embargo.liftdate9999-12-31-
dc.embargo.terms9999-12-31-
dc.contributor.localauthorPark, Sukyung-
dc.contributor.nonIdAuthorGianna-Poulin, C-
dc.contributor.nonIdAuthorBlack, FO-
dc.contributor.nonIdAuthorWood, S-
dc.contributor.nonIdAuthorMerfeld, DM-
dc.type.journalArticleArticle-
dc.subject.keywordPlusQUALITATIVELY DIFFERENT MECHANISMS-
dc.subject.keywordPlusPERCEIVED BODY POSITION-
dc.subject.keywordPlusGRAVITO-INERTIAL CUES-
dc.subject.keywordPlusLINEAR ACCELERATION-
dc.subject.keywordPlusECCENTRIC ROTATION-
dc.subject.keywordPlusSQUIRREL-MONKEY-
dc.subject.keywordPlusVESTIBULOOCULAR REFLEX-
dc.subject.keywordPlusVESTIBULAR PERCEPTION-
dc.subject.keywordPlusOCULOGRAVIC ILLUSION-
dc.subject.keywordPlusOCULAR TORSION-
Appears in Collection
ME-Journal Papers(저널논문)
Files in This Item
This item is cited by other documents in WoS
⊙ Detail Information in WoSⓡ Click to see webofscience_button
⊙ Cited 21 items in WoS Click to see citing articles in records_button

qr_code

  • mendeley

    citeulike


rss_1.0 rss_2.0 atom_1.0