DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | 채경철 | ko |
dc.contributor.author | 안창원 | ko |
dc.date.accessioned | 2013-02-27T22:57:30Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2013-02-27T22:57:30Z | - |
dc.date.created | 2012-02-06 | - |
dc.date.created | 2012-02-06 | - |
dc.date.issued | 1996-03 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | 응용통계연구, v.9, no.1, pp.203 - 214 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1225-066X | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10203/71330 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 이 글에서는, 최근 논란이 계속되고 있는 교환역설문제의 진상을 규명하고, 교환문제에서는 베이지안 의사결정이 항상 유리함을 보인다. 아울러, 교환문제를 불확실성하에서의 합리적 의사결정문제로 해석한다. In this tutorial note, we resolve debates generated by Exchange Paradox. In particular, we show that Bayesian solution is superior to frequentists. Then, in terms of decision analysis, we show that any rational decision is superior to no-action policy. | - |
dc.language | Korean | - |
dc.publisher | 한국통계학회 | - |
dc.title | 교환역설과 합리적 의사결정 | - |
dc.title.alternative | Exchange paradox and rational decision | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.type.rims | ART | - |
dc.citation.volume | 9 | - |
dc.citation.issue | 1 | - |
dc.citation.beginningpage | 203 | - |
dc.citation.endingpage | 214 | - |
dc.citation.publicationname | 응용통계연구 | - |
dc.contributor.localauthor | 채경철 | - |
dc.contributor.nonIdAuthor | 안창원 | - |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.