Assessing the Potential of Small Modular Reactors (SMRs) in Spent Nuclear Fuel Management: A Review of the Generation IV Reactor Progress

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
  • Hit : 340
  • Download : 0
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorPark, Hong Juneko
dc.contributor.authorChang, Sun Youngko
dc.contributor.authorKim, Kyung Sooko
dc.contributor.authorLevrd, Pascal Cluadeko
dc.contributor.authorMoon, Joo Hyunko
dc.contributor.authorYun, Jong-Ilko
dc.date.accessioned2024-02-16T04:00:10Z-
dc.date.available2024-02-16T04:00:10Z-
dc.date.created2023-11-06-
dc.date.created2023-11-06-
dc.date.created2023-11-06-
dc.date.created2023-11-06-
dc.date.issued2023-12-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Nuclear Fuel Cycle and Waste Technology, v.21, no.4, pp.571 - 576-
dc.identifier.issn1738-1894-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10203/318078-
dc.description.abstractThe initial development plans for the six reactor designs, soon after the release of Generation IV International Forum (GIF) TRM in 2002, were characterized by high ambition [1]. Specifically, the sodium-cooled fast reactor (SFR) and very-high temperature reactor (VHTR) gained significant attention and were expected to reach the validation stage by the 2020s, with commercial viability projected for the 2030s. However, these projections have been unrealized because of various factors. The development of reactor designs by the GIF was supposed to be influenced by events such as the 2008 global financial crisis, 2011 Fukushima accident [2, 3], discovery of extensive shale oil reserves in the United States, and overly ambitious technological targets. Consequently, the momentum for VHTR development reduced significantly. In this context, the aims of this study were to compare and analyze the development progress of the six Gen IV reactor designs over the past 20 years, based on the GIF roadmaps published in 2002 and 2014. The primary focus was to examine the prospects for the reactor designs in relation to spent nuclear fuel burning in conjunction with small modular reactor (SMR), including molten salt reactor (MSR), which is expected to have spent nuclear fuel management potential.-
dc.languageEnglish-
dc.publisherKorean Radioactive Waste Society-
dc.titleAssessing the Potential of Small Modular Reactors (SMRs) in Spent Nuclear Fuel Management: A Review of the Generation IV Reactor Progress-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.wosid001163516300012-
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-85184901145-
dc.type.rimsART-
dc.citation.volume21-
dc.citation.issue4-
dc.citation.beginningpage571-
dc.citation.endingpage576-
dc.citation.publicationnameJournal of Nuclear Fuel Cycle and Waste Technology-
dc.identifier.doi10.7733/jnfcwt.2023.037-
dc.identifier.kciidART003038585-
dc.contributor.localauthorYun, Jong-Il-
dc.contributor.nonIdAuthorPark, Hong June-
dc.contributor.nonIdAuthorChang, Sun Young-
dc.contributor.nonIdAuthorKim, Kyung Soo-
dc.contributor.nonIdAuthorLevrd, Pascal Cluade-
dc.contributor.nonIdAuthorMoon, Joo Hyun-
dc.description.isOpenAccessN-
dc.type.journalArticleReview-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorGIF (Generation IV international forum)-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorGeneration IV reactor-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorSMR (Small modular reactor)-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorMSR (Molten salt reactor)-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorGIF technical roadmap-
Appears in Collection
NE-Journal Papers(저널논문)
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.

qr_code

  • mendeley

    citeulike


rss_1.0 rss_2.0 atom_1.0