DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Kim, Inhyung | ko |
dc.contributor.author | Kim, Yonghee | ko |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-07-27T11:01:12Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2023-07-27T11:01:12Z | - |
dc.date.created | 2023-07-07 | - |
dc.date.issued | 2017-10 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | 2017 Transactions of the American Nuclear Society, ANS 2017, pp.675 - 678 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 0003-018X | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10203/310902 | - |
dc.description.abstract | The CMFD and p-CMFD acceleration schemes have been comparatively investigated in view of the Monte Carlo simulation. In terms of the FSD convergence, both CMFD and p-CMFD are very effective and comparable. However, the multi-cycle accumulation of the MC quantities is necessary for stable implementation of the conventional CMFD scheme, while the p-CMFD is always stable. Regarding the variance reduction, MC run with both CMFD and p-CMFD shows the smaller real-to-apparent variance. It is also mentioned that the p-CMFD reduces the variance more effectively than CMFD. In the future, further in-depth comparison will be conducted for the two CMFD schemes in a continuous energy MC platform. | - |
dc.language | English | - |
dc.publisher | American Nuclear Society | - |
dc.title | A comparative study on CMFD and p-CMFD acceleration in the Monte Carlo analysis | - |
dc.type | Conference | - |
dc.identifier.scopusid | 2-s2.0-85062007709 | - |
dc.type.rims | CONF | - |
dc.citation.beginningpage | 675 | - |
dc.citation.endingpage | 678 | - |
dc.citation.publicationname | 2017 Transactions of the American Nuclear Society, ANS 2017 | - |
dc.identifier.conferencecountry | US | - |
dc.identifier.conferencelocation | Washington | - |
dc.contributor.localauthor | Kim, Yonghee | - |
dc.contributor.nonIdAuthor | Kim, Inhyung | - |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.