How many mutually unbiased bases are needed to detect bound entangled states?

Cited 6 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
  • Hit : 118
  • Download : 41
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBae, Joonwooko
dc.contributor.authorBera, Aninditako
dc.contributor.authorChruscinski, Dariuszko
dc.contributor.authorHiesmayr, Beatrix C.ko
dc.contributor.authorMcNulty, Danielko
dc.date.accessioned2023-01-16T08:01:14Z-
dc.date.available2023-01-16T08:01:14Z-
dc.date.created2023-01-16-
dc.date.created2023-01-16-
dc.date.created2023-01-16-
dc.date.issued2022-12-
dc.identifier.citationJOURNAL OF PHYSICS A-MATHEMATICAL AND THEORETICAL, v.55, no.50-
dc.identifier.issn1751-8113-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10203/304475-
dc.description.abstractFrom a practical perspective it is advantageous to develop methods that verify entanglement in quantum states with as few measurements as possible. In this paper we investigate the minimal number of mutually unbiased bases (MUBs) needed to detect bound entanglement in bipartite (dxd)-dimensional states, i.e. entangled states that are positive under partial transposition. In particular, we show that a class of entanglement witnesses (EWs) composed of MUB scan detect bound entanglement if the number of measurements is greater than d/2+1. This is a substantial improvement over other detection methods, requiring significantly fewer resources than either full quantum state tomo-graphy or measuring a complete set ofd+1 MUBs. Our approach is based ona partial characterisation of the (non-)decomposability of EWs. We show that non-decomposability is a universal property of MUBs, which holds regardless of the choice of complementary observables, and we find that both the number of measurements and the structure of the witness play an important role in the detection of bound entanglement.-
dc.languageEnglish-
dc.publisherIOP Publishing Ltd-
dc.titleHow many mutually unbiased bases are needed to detect bound entangled states?-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.wosid000905199100001-
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-85146378559-
dc.type.rimsART-
dc.citation.volume55-
dc.citation.issue50-
dc.citation.publicationnameJOURNAL OF PHYSICS A-MATHEMATICAL AND THEORETICAL-
dc.identifier.doi10.1088/1751-8121/acaa16-
dc.contributor.localauthorBae, Joonwoo-
dc.contributor.nonIdAuthorBera, Anindita-
dc.contributor.nonIdAuthorChruscinski, Dariusz-
dc.contributor.nonIdAuthorHiesmayr, Beatrix C.-
dc.contributor.nonIdAuthorMcNulty, Daniel-
dc.description.isOpenAccessY-
dc.type.journalArticleArticle-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorentanglement detection-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorbound entanglement-
dc.subject.keywordAuthormutually unbiased bases-
dc.subject.keywordAuthornon-decomposable witnesses-
dc.subject.keywordPlusUNEXTENDIBLE PRODUCT BASES-
dc.subject.keywordPlusREDUCTION CRITERION-
dc.subject.keywordPlusDISTILLATION-
Appears in Collection
EE-Journal Papers(저널논문)
Files in This Item
127791.pdf(390.01 kB)Download
This item is cited by other documents in WoS
⊙ Detail Information in WoSⓡ Click to see webofscience_button
⊙ Cited 6 items in WoS Click to see citing articles in records_button

qr_code

  • mendeley

    citeulike


rss_1.0 rss_2.0 atom_1.0