Incumbent resistance and the solar transition: Changing opportunity structures and framing strategies

Cited 44 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
  • Hit : 188
  • Download : 0
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLee, Dasomko
dc.contributor.authorHess, David J.ko
dc.date.accessioned2022-09-15T01:00:44Z-
dc.date.available2022-09-15T01:00:44Z-
dc.date.created2022-09-14-
dc.date.issued2019-11-
dc.identifier.citationENVIRONMENTAL INNOVATION AND SOCIETAL TRANSITIONS, v.33, pp.183 - 195-
dc.identifier.issn2210-4224-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10203/298539-
dc.description.abstractSustainability transitions often involve policy conflicts, especially when incumbents perceive threats to their business models, and conflicts involve framing of competing positions in the public sphere. Using the case of the growth of distributed solar energy in the U.S. electricity sector, this study shows how the concepts of industry and political opportunity structures can help to explain variation in discursive strategy. First, when incumbents perceive the growth of the challenger as a threat, the industry opportunity structure closes, the volume of framing activity in the public sphere increases as contention grows, and the differentiation in framing (the ratio of pro- to anti-transition frames) between incumbents and challengers increases. Second, with respect to the political opportunity structure, the selection of frame types (environmental versus economic-consumer) varies in relationship to control of the government by conservative or progressive parties. Theoretical implications for transitions studies are discussed.-
dc.languageEnglish-
dc.publisherELSEVIER-
dc.titleIncumbent resistance and the solar transition: Changing opportunity structures and framing strategies-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.wosid000496451100012-
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-85066626436-
dc.type.rimsART-
dc.citation.volume33-
dc.citation.beginningpage183-
dc.citation.endingpage195-
dc.citation.publicationnameENVIRONMENTAL INNOVATION AND SOCIETAL TRANSITIONS-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.eist.2019.05.005-
dc.contributor.localauthorLee, Dasom-
dc.contributor.nonIdAuthorHess, David J.-
dc.description.isOpenAccessN-
dc.type.journalArticleArticle-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorSustainability transitions-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorSolar energy-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorPolicy-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorFraming-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorOpportunity structure-
dc.subject.keywordPlusANTI-BIOTECH MOVEMENT-
dc.subject.keywordPlusSOCIOTECHNICAL TRANSITIONS-
dc.subject.keywordPlusSOCIAL-MOVEMENTS-
dc.subject.keywordPlusENERGY-
dc.subject.keywordPlusPOLITICS-
dc.subject.keywordPlusPOWER-
dc.subject.keywordPlusGOVERNMENT-
dc.subject.keywordPlusCOALITIONS-
dc.subject.keywordPlusDEMOCRACY-
dc.subject.keywordPlusSUPPORT-
Appears in Collection
STP-Journal Papers(저널논문)
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
This item is cited by other documents in WoS
⊙ Detail Information in WoSⓡ Click to see webofscience_button
⊙ Cited 44 items in WoS Click to see citing articles in records_button

qr_code

  • mendeley

    citeulike


rss_1.0 rss_2.0 atom_1.0