DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | Kum, Dongsuk | - |
dc.contributor.advisor | 금동석 | - |
dc.contributor.author | Kim, Jaeyoon | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-04-27T19:32:28Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2022-04-27T19:32:28Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2021 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://library.kaist.ac.kr/search/detail/view.do?bibCtrlNo=948363&flag=dissertation | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10203/296208 | - |
dc.description | 학위논문(석사) - 한국과학기술원 : 조천식녹색교통대학원, 2021.2,[iv, 47 p. :] | - |
dc.description.abstract | Pre-transmission parallel hybrid electric vehicles (HEVs) have various architectures depending on the type and size of an engine-start motor. Such architectural variations pose a design trade-off between cost and engine-start performance. For instance, a parallel HEV (P2) without a starter motor is cost-effective, but suffers from poor engine-start performance, and a parallel HEV with a large starter motor/generator (a.k.a P0-P2) provides much better engine-start performance at the expense of higher cost. Recently, a P2 HEV with a 12V starter motor (12V+P2) is also being considered as a balanced solution to this design trade-off. In this paper, we systematically evaluate the optimal engine-start performance of three parallel HEVs with various starter motors and discuss how each architecture compares to one another in terms of engine-start performance. First, three parallel HEV powertrain models are developed to characterize the transient behavior during engine-starts. Then, optimal control problems of three systems are formulated and solved to find the optimal engine-start performance. In order to systematically evaluate and compare the engine-start performance, two drivability measures are defined | - |
dc.description.abstract | power demand deficit and engine-start time. The evaluation results based on these drivability measures enable a fair and quantitative comparison between three parallel HEV architectures under various engine-start conditions, e.g. power demand. Comparative study shows that engine-start time of a P2 HEV without a starter motor can be similar to that of P0-P2. However, in this case, the power demand cannot be satisfied in P2 only system. In addition, 12V+P2 shows the same traction performance as P0-P2 and shows an acceptable engine-start time performance. Therefore, if the engine which has high non-linearity can be accurately controlled, it can be a balanced architecture that reduces cost and provides good performance as well. | - |
dc.language | eng | - |
dc.publisher | 한국과학기술원 | - |
dc.subject | Engine-Start▼aDrivability▼aParallel Hybrid Electric Vehicle▼aOptimal Control Strategy▼aStarter Motor▼aClutch Control | - |
dc.subject | 엔진 시동▼a운전성▼a병렬형 하이브리드 차량▼a최적 제어 전략▼a시동 모터▼a클러치 제어 | - |
dc.title | Comparative study on optimal engine-start performance of parallel hybrid electric vehicles with various starter motors | - |
dc.title.alternative | 다양한 시동 모터에 따른 병렬형 하이브리드 차량의 최적 엔진 시동 성능에 관한 비교 연구 | - |
dc.type | Thesis(Master) | - |
dc.identifier.CNRN | 325007 | - |
dc.description.department | 한국과학기술원 :조천식녹색교통대학원, | - |
dc.contributor.alternativeauthor | 김재윤 | - |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.