Normal shock boundary layer control with various vortex generator geometries

Cited 57 time in webofscience Cited 79 time in scopus
  • Hit : 244
  • Download : 0
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLee, S.ko
dc.contributor.authorLoth, E.ko
dc.contributor.authorBabinsky, H.ko
dc.date.accessioned2020-03-19T04:20:18Z-
dc.date.available2020-03-19T04:20:18Z-
dc.date.created2020-02-17-
dc.date.created2020-02-17-
dc.date.issued2011-10-
dc.identifier.citationCOMPUTERS & FLUIDS, v.49, no.1, pp.233 - 246-
dc.identifier.issn0045-7930-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10203/272980-
dc.description.abstractVarious vortex generators which include ramp, split-ramp and a new hybrid concept ""ramped-vane"" are investigated under normal shock conditions with a diffuser at Mach number of 1.3. The dimensions of the computational domain were designed using Reynolds Average Navier-Stokes studies to be representative of the flow in an external-compression supersonic inlet. Using this flow geometry, various vortex generator concepts were studied with Implicit Large Eddy Simulation. In general, the ramped-vane provided increased vorticity compared to the other devices and reduced the separation length downstream of the device centerline. In addition, the size, edge gap and streamwise position respect to the shock were studied for the ramped-vane and it was found that a height of about half the boundary thickness and a large trailing edge gap yielded a fully attached flow downstream of the device. This ramped-vane also provided the largest reduction in the turbulent kinetic energy and pressure fluctuations. Additional benefits include negligible drag while the reductions in boundary layer displacement thickness and shape factor were seen compared to other devices. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.-
dc.languageEnglish-
dc.publisherPERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD-
dc.titleNormal shock boundary layer control with various vortex generator geometries-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.wosid000293941100022-
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-79960892672-
dc.type.rimsART-
dc.citation.volume49-
dc.citation.issue1-
dc.citation.beginningpage233-
dc.citation.endingpage246-
dc.citation.publicationnameCOMPUTERS & FLUIDS-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.compfluid.2011.06.003-
dc.contributor.localauthorLee, S.-
dc.contributor.nonIdAuthorLoth, E.-
dc.contributor.nonIdAuthorBabinsky, H.-
dc.description.isOpenAccessN-
dc.type.journalArticleArticle-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorFlow control-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorSupersonic boundary layer interaction-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorVortex generator-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorImplicit Large Eddy Simulation-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorFlow separation-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorDiffuser-
dc.subject.keywordPlusDIRECT NUMERICAL-SIMULATION-
dc.subject.keywordPlusFLOW-CONTROL-
Appears in Collection
AE-Journal Papers(저널논문)
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
This item is cited by other documents in WoS
⊙ Detail Information in WoSⓡ Click to see webofscience_button
⊙ Cited 57 items in WoS Click to see citing articles in records_button

qr_code

  • mendeley

    citeulike


rss_1.0 rss_2.0 atom_1.0