The Matthew Effect as an Unjust Competitive Advantage: Implications for Competition Near Status Boundaries

Cited 4 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
  • Hit : 139
  • Download : 0
Merton often envisioned status growth as a process of stepping across a boundary between one status grade and another more elite status grade. Such boundaries include the border between graduate school and a top academic department that young researchers try to traverse, or the frontier between scientists outside the French Academy and scientists inside the French Academy. As it is now common to measure status continuously using network data, the behavioral ramifications of status boundaries have been understudied in recent research. In this essay, we focus on competitive behaviors that emerge near a status boundary because of the desirability—as well as the “double injustice”—of the Matthew Effect. Offering insights for future research, we discuss how these competitive behaviors are likely to delay, or even derail, status growth for those who are near a status boundary.
Publisher
SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
Issue Date
2018-10
Language
English
Article Type
Article
Keywords

TOURNAMENT; LIABILITY; SCIENCE; RIVALRY; NASCAR

Citation

JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT INQUIRY, v.27, no.4, pp.378 - 381

ISSN
1056-4926
DOI
10.1177/1056492617737712
URI
http://hdl.handle.net/10203/245879
Appears in Collection
GCT-Journal Papers(저널논문)
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
This item is cited by other documents in WoS
⊙ Detail Information in WoSⓡ Click to see webofscience_button
⊙ Cited 4 items in WoS Click to see citing articles in records_button

qr_code

  • mendeley

    citeulike


rss_1.0 rss_2.0 atom_1.0