Opinion Formation in the Digital Divide

Cited 10 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
  • Hit : 978
  • Download : 755
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLim, Dongwonko
dc.contributor.authorLee, Hwansooko
dc.contributor.authorZO, Hang-Jungko
dc.contributor.authorCiganek, Andrewko
dc.date.accessioned2017-04-17T08:04:18Z-
dc.date.available2017-04-17T08:04:18Z-
dc.date.created2015-06-05-
dc.date.created2015-06-05-
dc.date.created2015-06-05-
dc.date.issued2014-01-
dc.identifier.citationJASSS-THE JOURNAL OF ARTIFICIAL SOCIETIES AND SOCIAL SIMULATION, v.17, no.1-
dc.identifier.issn1460-7425-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10203/223382-
dc.description.abstractThe Internet is a public environment where people increasingly share information and exchange opinions. Not everyone can afford the costs of using the Internet, causing online opinions to be distorted in favor of certain social groups. This study examines the effect of the digital divide on opinion formation using the agent-based modeling (ABM) method. It extends the bounded confidence model to incorporate an online context and introduces accessibility and connectivity as new parameters. The simulation results indicate that connected agents are quicker to converge on a certain opinion than disconnected agents. Connected agents form an opinion cluster while disconnected agents are scattered over a broad range of opinions. The results also show that social harmony is harder to achieve as an individual's ability to communicate their own opinion improves. Both connected and disconnected agents are more likely to become a minority with higher accessibility. Disconnected agents are 11 to 14 times more likely to become a minority than connected agents, which suggests that the digital divide may be associated with discrimination. This study provides additional insights for academia as well as practitioners on opinion formation in the digital divide. Research limitations are addressed along with suggested future research directions.-
dc.languageEnglish-
dc.publisherJ A S S S-
dc.subjectCOMPUTER-MEDIATED COMMUNICATION-
dc.subjectFACE-TO-FACE-
dc.subjectTRADITIONAL MEDIA-
dc.subjectSOCIAL NETWORKS-
dc.subjectINTERNET-
dc.subjectDYNAMICS-
dc.subjectUSAGE-
dc.subjectBLOG-
dc.subjectPOLARIZATION-
dc.subjectDISCUSSIONS-
dc.titleOpinion Formation in the Digital Divide-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.wosid000339119400019-
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-84893354388-
dc.type.rimsART-
dc.citation.volume17-
dc.citation.issue1-
dc.citation.publicationnameJASSS-THE JOURNAL OF ARTIFICIAL SOCIETIES AND SOCIAL SIMULATION-
dc.identifier.doi10.18564/jasss.2366-
dc.contributor.localauthorZO, Hang-Jung-
dc.contributor.nonIdAuthorCiganek, Andrew-
dc.description.isOpenAccessY-
dc.type.journalArticleArticle-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorDigital Divide-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorOpinion Dynamics-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorAgent-Based Model-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorBounded Confidence Model-
dc.subject.keywordPlusCOMPUTER-MEDIATED COMMUNICATION-
dc.subject.keywordPlusFACE-TO-FACE-
dc.subject.keywordPlusINTERNET CONNECTEDNESS-
dc.subject.keywordPlusTRADITIONAL MEDIA-
dc.subject.keywordPlusSOCIAL NETWORKS-
dc.subject.keywordPlusDYNAMICS-
dc.subject.keywordPlusUSAGE-
dc.subject.keywordPlusBLOG-
dc.subject.keywordPlusPOLARIZATION-
dc.subject.keywordPlusDISCUSSIONS-
Appears in Collection
MG-Journal Papers(저널논문)
Files in This Item
90445.pdf(1.16 MB)Download
This item is cited by other documents in WoS
⊙ Detail Information in WoSⓡ Click to see webofscience_button
⊙ Cited 10 items in WoS Click to see citing articles in records_button

qr_code

  • mendeley

    citeulike


rss_1.0 rss_2.0 atom_1.0