Evaluation of the thermal efficiency and a cost analysis of different types of ground heat exchangers in energy piles

Cited 72 time in webofscience Cited 67 time in scopus
  • Hit : 562
  • Download : 0
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorYoon, Seokko
dc.contributor.authorLee, Seung-Raeko
dc.contributor.authorJianfeng Xueko
dc.contributor.authorKai Zossederko
dc.contributor.authorGo, Gyu-Hyunko
dc.contributor.authorPark, Hyunkuko
dc.date.accessioned2016-04-20T06:14:40Z-
dc.date.available2016-04-20T06:14:40Z-
dc.date.created2015-11-20-
dc.date.created2015-11-20-
dc.date.issued2015-11-
dc.identifier.citationENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, v.105, pp.393 - 402-
dc.identifier.issn0196-8904-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10203/205195-
dc.description.abstractThis paper presents an experimental and numerical study of the results of a thermal performance test using precast high-strength concrete (PHC) energy piles with W and coil-type ground heat exchangers (GHEs). In-situ thermal performance tests (TPTs) were conducted for four days under an intermittent operation condition (8 h on; 16 h off) on W and coil-type PHC energy piles installed in a partially saturated weathered granite soil deposit. In addition, three-dimensional finite element analyses were conducted and the results were compared with the four-day experimental results. The heat exchange rates were also predicted for three months using the numerical analysis. The heat exchange rate of the coil-type GHE showed 10-15% higher efficiency compared to the W-type GHE in the energy pile. However, in considering the cost for the installation of the heat exchanger and cement grouting the additional cost of W-type GHE in energy pile was 200-250% cheaper than coil-type GHE under the condition providing equivalent thermal performance. Furthermore, the required lengths of the W, 3U and coil-type GHEs in the energy piles were calculated based on the design process of Kavanaugh and Rafferty. The additional cost for the W and 3U types of GHEs were also 200-250% lower than that of the coil-type GHE. However, the required number of piles was much less with the coil-type GHE as compared to the W and 3U types of GHEs. They are advantageous in terms of the construction period, and further, selecting the coil-type GHE could be a viable option when there is a limitation in the number of piles in consideration of the scale of the building.-
dc.languageEnglish-
dc.publisherPERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD-
dc.subjectPUMP SYSTEMS-
dc.subjectIN-SITU-
dc.subjectPERFORMANCE-
dc.subjectTEMPERATURE-
dc.subjectMODEL-
dc.subjectFOUNDATION-
dc.subjectBEHAVIOR-
dc.titleEvaluation of the thermal efficiency and a cost analysis of different types of ground heat exchangers in energy piles-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.wosid000363068900035-
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-84939166936-
dc.type.rimsART-
dc.citation.volume105-
dc.citation.beginningpage393-
dc.citation.endingpage402-
dc.citation.publicationnameENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.enconman.2015.08.002-
dc.contributor.localauthorLee, Seung-Rae-
dc.contributor.nonIdAuthorJianfeng Xue-
dc.contributor.nonIdAuthorKai Zosseder-
dc.contributor.nonIdAuthorPark, Hyunku-
dc.type.journalArticleArticle-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorEnergy pile-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorThermal performance test-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorHeat exchange rate-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorCost analysis-
dc.subject.keywordPlusPUMP SYSTEMS-
dc.subject.keywordPlusIN-SITU-
dc.subject.keywordPlusPERFORMANCE-
dc.subject.keywordPlusTEMPERATURE-
dc.subject.keywordPlusMODEL-
dc.subject.keywordPlusFOUNDATION-
dc.subject.keywordPlusBEHAVIOR-
Appears in Collection
CE-Journal Papers(저널논문)
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
This item is cited by other documents in WoS
⊙ Detail Information in WoSⓡ Click to see webofscience_button
⊙ Cited 72 items in WoS Click to see citing articles in records_button

qr_code

  • mendeley

    citeulike


rss_1.0 rss_2.0 atom_1.0