Scheduling Cluster Tools for Concurrent Processing of Two Wafer Types

Cited 54 time in webofscience Cited 48 time in scopus
  • Hit : 420
  • Download : 15
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLee, Jun-Hoko
dc.contributor.authorKim, Hyunjungko
dc.contributor.authorLee, Tae-Eogko
dc.date.accessioned2014-09-01T07:15:13Z-
dc.date.available2014-09-01T07:15:13Z-
dc.date.created2014-06-03-
dc.date.created2014-06-03-
dc.date.created2014-06-03-
dc.date.created2014-06-03-
dc.date.created2014-06-03-
dc.date.issued2014-04-
dc.identifier.citationIEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATION SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, v.11, no.2, pp.525 - 536-
dc.identifier.issn1545-5955-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10203/189198-
dc.description.abstractWe examine a scheduling problem of cluster tools that concurrently process two wafer types in a cyclic operational sequence. Whereas the process steps for different wafer types are assigned to different processing modules (PMs), the wafer loading and unloading tasks at the PMs are performed by a single robot. For a given cycle plan, which is a mix of different wafers for each cycle, we wish to determine the robot task sequence so as to minimize the tool cycle time. When a single wafer type is processed, the backward and swap sequences are optimal for single-armed and dual-armed tools, respectively. They are being prevalently used because of their simplicity and robustness. To maintain such advantages in concurrent processing, we introduce and define the concurrent backward and swap sequences (CBSs and CSSs, respectively). We then develop conditions on process times, robot task times, and the number of wafers produced in a cycle for which such CBSs and CSSs are still optimal for concurrent processing. We also show that, for some special cases, the two wafer types can achieve their maximum throughput rates as if each wafer type exclusively uses the tool regardless of other wafer types in progress. When the developed conditions do not hold, an effective mixed integer programming (MIP) model based on the CBSs and CSSs is used for robot task sequencing. Finally, we experimentally verify its efficiency and effectiveness by comparing to the existing scheduling methods for optimal scheduling of cluster tools.-
dc.languageEnglish-
dc.publisherIEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC-
dc.titleScheduling Cluster Tools for Concurrent Processing of Two Wafer Types-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.wosid000334740800019-
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-84899086961-
dc.type.rimsART-
dc.citation.volume11-
dc.citation.issue2-
dc.citation.beginningpage525-
dc.citation.endingpage536-
dc.citation.publicationnameIEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATION SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING-
dc.identifier.doi10.1109/TASE.2013.2296855-
dc.embargo.liftdate9999-12-31-
dc.embargo.terms9999-12-31-
dc.contributor.localauthorKim, Hyunjung-
dc.contributor.localauthorLee, Tae-Eog-
dc.description.isOpenAccessN-
dc.type.journalArticleArticle-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorCluster tools-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorconcurrent processing-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorcyclic scheduling-
dc.subject.keywordAuthormixed integer programming-
dc.subject.keywordAuthortwo wafer types-
dc.subject.keywordPlusRESIDENCY TIME CONSTRAINTS-
dc.subject.keywordPlusSTEADY-STATE THROUGHPUT-
dc.subject.keywordPlusPETRI-NET-
dc.subject.keywordPlusMULTICLUSTER TOOLS-
dc.subject.keywordPlusROBOTIC CELL-
dc.subject.keywordPlusHOIST-
dc.subject.keywordPlusSCHEDULABILITY-
dc.subject.keywordPlusPARTS-
Appears in Collection
IE-Journal Papers(저널논문)
Files in This Item
This item is cited by other documents in WoS
⊙ Detail Information in WoSⓡ Click to see webofscience_button
⊙ Cited 54 items in WoS Click to see citing articles in records_button

qr_code

  • mendeley

    citeulike


rss_1.0 rss_2.0 atom_1.0