Comparing and Combining Sentiment Analysis Methods

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
  • Hit : 202
  • Download : 482
Several messages express opinions about events, products, and services, political views or even their author’s emotional state and mood. Sentiment analysis has been used in several applications including analysis of the repercussions of events in social networks, analysis of opinions about products and services, and simply to better understand aspects of social communication in Online Social Networks (OSNs). There are multiple methods for measuring sentiments, including lexical-based approaches and supervised machine learning methods. Despite the wide use and popularity of some methods, it is unclear which method is better for identifying the polarity (i.e., positive or negative) of a message as the current literature does not provide a method of comparison among existing methods. Such a comparison is crucial for understanding the potential limitations, advantages, and disadvantages of popular methods in analyzing the content of OSNs messages. Our study aims at filling this gap by presenting comparisons of eight popular sentiment analysis methods in terms of coverage (i.e., the fraction of messages whose sentiment is identified) and agreement (i.e., the fraction of identified sentiments that are in tune with ground truth). We develop a new method that combines existing approaches, providing the best coverage results and competitive agreement. We also present a free Web service called iFeel, which provides an open API for accessing and comparing results across different sentiment methods for a given text.
Publisher
ACM
Issue Date
2013-10-07
Language
ENG
Citation

Conference on Online Social Networks 2013, pp.27 - 37

DOI
10.1145/2512938.2512951
URI
http://hdl.handle.net/10203/188085
Appears in Collection
CS-Conference Papers(학술회의논문)
Files in This Item
79997.pdf(612.91 kB)Download

qr_code

  • mendeley

    citeulike


rss_1.0 rss_2.0 atom_1.0