HYBRID기법과 QUICKER기법 : 공동유동의 계산특성 비교HYBRID Scheme vs . QUICKER Scheme : Comparison Based on Lid - driven Cavity flow Computations

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
  • Hit : 434
  • Download : 29
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.author조, 성호-
dc.contributor.author강, 인준-
dc.contributor.author박, 승오-
dc.contributor.authorCho, Seong-Ho-
dc.contributor.authorKang, In-Jun-
dc.contributor.authorPark, Seung-O-
dc.date.accessioned2009-09-14T08:51:35Z-
dc.date.available2009-09-14T08:51:35Z-
dc.date.issued1993-06-
dc.identifier.citation대한기계학회논문집, Vol.17, No.6, pp.1640~1647en
dc.identifier.issn1225-5955-
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ksme.or.kr/-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10203/11205-
dc.description.abstractThe numerical diffusion arising from streamline-to-grid skewness produces a deteriorating effect on the numerical accuracy. The QUICKER scheme to reduce the numerical diffusion requires more computational effect than the HYBRID scheme. This paper deals with the relative computational efficiencies of adopting QUICKER scheme with a coarser grid system and of adopting HYBRID scheme with a denser grid system. Laminar driven cavity flow with Re=400, 1000 is used as a test problem. It is found that QUICKER scheme with a coarser grid system is more efficient than the HYBRID scheme with a denser grid system.en
dc.language.isokoen
dc.publisher대한기계학회en
dc.subjectHYBRID 기법en
dc.subjectQUICKER 기법en
dc.subject공동흐름en
dc.subject계산효율en
dc.titleHYBRID기법과 QUICKER기법 : 공동유동의 계산특성 비교en
dc.title.alternativeHYBRID Scheme vs . QUICKER Scheme : Comparison Based on Lid - driven Cavity flow Computationsen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.language.Alternativeen_USen
dc.subject.alternativeHYBRID Schemeen
dc.subject.alternativeQUICKER schemeen
dc.subject.alternativeLid-driven cavity flowen
dc.subject.alternativeComputational efficiencyen
Appears in Collection
AE-Journal Papers(저널논문)

qr_code

  • mendeley

    citeulike


rss_1.0 rss_2.0 atom_1.0