Laxity dynamics and LLF schedulability analysis on multiprocessor platforms

Cited 10 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
  • Hit : 667
  • Download : 0
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLee, Jinkyuko
dc.contributor.authorEaswaran, Arvindko
dc.contributor.authorShin, Insikko
dc.date.accessioned2013-03-13T04:07:26Z-
dc.date.available2013-03-13T04:07:26Z-
dc.date.created2012-10-30-
dc.date.created2012-10-30-
dc.date.issued2012-11-
dc.identifier.citationREAL-TIME SYSTEMS, v.48, no.6, pp.716 - 749-
dc.identifier.issn0922-6443-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10203/104432-
dc.description.abstractLLF (Least Laxity First) scheduling, which assigns a higher priority to a task with a smaller laxity, has been known as an optimal preemptive scheduling algorithm on a single processor platform. However, little work has been made to illuminate its characteristics upon multiprocessor platforms. In this paper, we identify the dynamics of laxity from the system's viewpoint and translate the dynamics into LLF multiprocessor schedulability analysis. More specifically, we first characterize laxity properties under LLF scheduling, focusing on laxity dynamics associated with a deadline miss. These laxity dynamics describe a lower bound, which leads to the deadline miss, on the number of tasks of certain laxity values at certain time instants. This lower bound is significant because it represents invariants for highly dynamic system parameters (laxity values). Since the laxity of a task is dependent of the amount of interference of higher-priority tasks, we can then derive a set of conditions to check whether a given task system can go into the laxity dynamics towards a deadline miss. This way, to the author's best knowledge, we propose the first LLF multiprocessor schedulability test based on its own laxity properties. We also develop an improved schedulability test that exploits slack values. We mathematically prove that the proposed LLF tests dominate the state-of-the-art EDZL tests. We also present simulation results to evaluate schedulability performance of both the original and improved LLF tests in a quantitative manner.-
dc.languageEnglish-
dc.publisherSPRINGER-
dc.subjectREAL-TIME TASKS-
dc.subjectSCHEDULING ALGORITHMS-
dc.subjectSYSTEMS-
dc.subjectEDF-
dc.titleLaxity dynamics and LLF schedulability analysis on multiprocessor platforms-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.wosid000309108200004-
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-84869084804-
dc.type.rimsART-
dc.citation.volume48-
dc.citation.issue6-
dc.citation.beginningpage716-
dc.citation.endingpage749-
dc.citation.publicationnameREAL-TIME SYSTEMS-
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s11241-012-9157-x-
dc.contributor.localauthorShin, Insik-
dc.contributor.nonIdAuthorEaswaran, Arvind-
dc.type.journalArticleArticle-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorSchedulability analysis-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorLaxity dynamics-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorLLF (Least Laxity First)-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorMultiprocessor platforms-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorReal-time scheduling-
dc.subject.keywordPlusREAL-TIME TASKS-
dc.subject.keywordPlusSCHEDULING ALGORITHMS-
dc.subject.keywordPlusSYSTEMS-
dc.subject.keywordPlusEDF-
Appears in Collection
CS-Journal Papers(저널논문)
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
This item is cited by other documents in WoS
⊙ Detail Information in WoSⓡ Click to see webofscience_button
⊙ Cited 10 items in WoS Click to see citing articles in records_button

qr_code

  • mendeley

    citeulike


rss_1.0 rss_2.0 atom_1.0