Design of safety-critical systems using the complementarities of success and failure domains with a case study

Cited 13 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
  • Hit : 378
  • Download : 0
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAhmed, Rizwanko
dc.contributor.authorKoo, June Moko
dc.contributor.authorJeong, Yong Hoonko
dc.contributor.authorHeo, Gyunyoungko
dc.date.accessioned2013-03-12T02:59:38Z-
dc.date.available2013-03-12T02:59:38Z-
dc.date.created2012-02-06-
dc.date.created2012-02-06-
dc.date.issued2011-01-
dc.identifier.citationRELIABILITY ENGINEERING SYSTEM SAFETY, v.96, no.1, pp.201 - 209-
dc.identifier.issn0951-8320-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10203/101148-
dc.description.abstractA safety-critical system has to qualify the performance-related requirements and the safety-related requirements simultaneously. Conceptually, design processes should consider both of them simultaneously but the practices do not and/or cannot follow such a theoretical approach due to the limitation of design resources. From our experience, we found that safety-related functions must be simultaneously resolved with the development of performance-related functions, particularly, in case of safety-critical systems. Since, success and failure domain analyses are essential for the investigation of performance-related and safety-related requirements, respectively, we articulated our perception to Axiomatic Design (AD), Fault Tree Analysis (ETA), and TRIZ. A design evolution procedure considering feedbacks from AD to identify functional couplings, TRIZ methodology to explore uncoupling solutions and FTA to improve reliability in a systematic way is presented here. A case study regarding design of safety injection tank installed in a nuclear power plant is also included to illustrate the proposed framework. It is expected that several iterations between AD-TRIZ-FTA would result into an optimized design which could be tested against the desired performance and safety criteria. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.-
dc.languageEnglish-
dc.publisherELSEVIER SCI LTD-
dc.subjectAXIOMATIC DESIGN-
dc.titleDesign of safety-critical systems using the complementarities of success and failure domains with a case study-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.wosid000285079200020-
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-78649319951-
dc.type.rimsART-
dc.citation.volume96-
dc.citation.issue1-
dc.citation.beginningpage201-
dc.citation.endingpage209-
dc.citation.publicationnameRELIABILITY ENGINEERING SYSTEM SAFETY-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ress.2010.09.008-
dc.contributor.localauthorJeong, Yong Hoon-
dc.contributor.nonIdAuthorAhmed, Rizwan-
dc.contributor.nonIdAuthorKoo, June Mo-
dc.contributor.nonIdAuthorHeo, Gyunyoung-
dc.type.journalArticleArticle-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorSafety-critical system-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorAxiomatic Design-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorFault Tree Analysis-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorTRIZ-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorSuccess domain-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorFailure domain-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorComplementarities-
dc.subject.keywordPlusAXIOMATIC DESIGN-
Appears in Collection
NE-Journal Papers(저널논문)
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
This item is cited by other documents in WoS
⊙ Detail Information in WoSⓡ Click to see webofscience_button
⊙ Cited 13 items in WoS Click to see citing articles in records_button

qr_code

  • mendeley

    citeulike


rss_1.0 rss_2.0 atom_1.0