Performance Comparison of Downlink Capacity Improvement Schemes: Orthogonal Code-Hopping Multiplexing Versus Multiple Scrambling Codes

Cited 1 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
  • Hit : 330
  • Download : 0
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorJung, Bang Chulko
dc.contributor.authorCho, Sung Sooko
dc.contributor.authorSung, Dan Keunko
dc.date.accessioned2013-03-08T18:48:32Z-
dc.date.available2013-03-08T18:48:32Z-
dc.date.created2012-02-06-
dc.date.created2012-02-06-
dc.date.issued2009-02-
dc.identifier.citationIEEE TRANSACTIONS ON VEHICULAR TECHNOLOGY, v.58, no.2, pp.670 - 681-
dc.identifier.issn0018-9545-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10203/93953-
dc.description.abstractIn this paper, we compare the performance of two downlink capacity-improvement schemes based on orthogonal code-hopping multiplexing (OCHM) and multiple scrambling codes (MSCs). Both OCHM and MSC systems have been proposed to overcome a code-limitation problem in a code division multiple access (CDMA) downlink. We mathematically analyze the user capacity in a general form, considering various factors such as user activity, spreading factor, amount of transmission symbol energy that is allocated to common control channels, amount of outer-cell interference, orthogonality factor, and sectorization factor. Numerical examples show that the capacity gain of the OCHM-based system increases as the other-cell interference decreases and the channel activity decreases. Thus, the OCHM-based system is a more effective scheme than the MSC-based system, considering that a code-limited situation more frequently occurs in the case of low other-cell interference and low channel activity. However, the OCHM-based system is more sensitive to the orthogonality factor.-
dc.languageEnglish-
dc.publisherIEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC-
dc.subjectRATIO LLR CONVERSION-
dc.subjectCONVOLUTIONAL-CODES-
dc.subjectCOMMUNICATION-SYSTEMS-
dc.subjectTURBO CODES-
dc.subjectFREQUENCY-
dc.titlePerformance Comparison of Downlink Capacity Improvement Schemes: Orthogonal Code-Hopping Multiplexing Versus Multiple Scrambling Codes-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.wosid000263639300014-
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-61449238131-
dc.type.rimsART-
dc.citation.volume58-
dc.citation.issue2-
dc.citation.beginningpage670-
dc.citation.endingpage681-
dc.citation.publicationnameIEEE TRANSACTIONS ON VEHICULAR TECHNOLOGY-
dc.identifier.doi10.1109/TVT.2008.926070-
dc.contributor.localauthorSung, Dan Keun-
dc.contributor.nonIdAuthorCho, Sung Soo-
dc.type.journalArticleArticle-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorDownlink power allocation-
dc.subject.keywordAuthormultiple scrambling codes (MSCs)-
dc.subject.keywordAuthororthogonal code hopping multiplexing (OCHM)-
dc.subject.keywordAuthoruser capacity-
dc.subject.keywordPlusRATIO LLR CONVERSION-
dc.subject.keywordPlusCONVOLUTIONAL-CODES-
dc.subject.keywordPlusCOMMUNICATION-SYSTEMS-
dc.subject.keywordPlusTURBO CODES-
dc.subject.keywordPlusFREQUENCY-
Appears in Collection
EE-Journal Papers(저널논문)
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
This item is cited by other documents in WoS
⊙ Detail Information in WoSⓡ Click to see webofscience_button
⊙ Cited 1 items in WoS Click to see citing articles in records_button

qr_code

  • mendeley

    citeulike


rss_1.0 rss_2.0 atom_1.0