The IS risk analysis based on a business model

Cited 75 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
  • Hit : 1160
  • Download : 825
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSuh, Bko
dc.contributor.authorHan, Ingooko
dc.date.accessioned2008-04-07T06:17:59Z-
dc.date.available2008-04-07T06:17:59Z-
dc.date.created2012-02-06-
dc.date.created2012-02-06-
dc.date.issued2003-12-
dc.identifier.citationINFORMATION & MANAGEMENT, v.41, pp.149 - 158-
dc.identifier.issn0378-7206-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10203/3686-
dc.description.abstractThe disruption of operations due to IS failure becomes more important as IS has become an increasingly essential component of the organization's operations and can affect its strategic objectives. Nevertheless, traditional IS risk analysis methods do not adequately reflect the loss from disruption of operations in determining the value of IS assets. Quantitative methods do not measure the loss from disruption of operations. Qualitative methods consider the loss, but their results are subjective and not suitable for cost-benefit decision support. There is a lack of systematic methods to measure the value of IS assets from the viewpoint of operational continuity. This study presents an IS risk analysis method based on a business model. The method uses a systematic quantitative approach dealing with operational continuity: the importance of various business functions and the necessity level of various assets are first determined. The value of each asset is then determined based on these two levels. The proposed method adds the first stage, organizational investigation, to traditional risk analysis. The process of the method utilizes various methodologies such as paired comparison, asset-function assignment tables, and asset dependency diagrams. (C) 2003 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.-
dc.languageEnglish-
dc.language.isoen_USen
dc.publisherELSEVIER SCIENCE BV-
dc.subjectINFORMATION-SYSTEMS-
dc.subjectMANAGEMENT-
dc.titleThe IS risk analysis based on a business model-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.wosid000186248300003-
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-0141919268-
dc.type.rimsART-
dc.citation.volume41-
dc.citation.beginningpage149-
dc.citation.endingpage158-
dc.citation.publicationnameINFORMATION & MANAGEMENT-
dc.embargo.liftdate9999-12-31-
dc.embargo.terms9999-12-31-
dc.contributor.localauthorHan, Ingoo-
dc.contributor.nonIdAuthorSuh, B-
dc.type.journalArticleArticle-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorrisk analysis-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorasset valuation-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorbusiness model-
dc.subject.keywordAuthoranalytic hierarchy process (AHP)-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorasset-function assignment-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorpaired comparison-
dc.subject.keywordPlusINFORMATION-SYSTEMS-
dc.subject.keywordPlusMANAGEMENT-
Appears in Collection
MT-Journal Papers(저널논문)
Files in This Item
This item is cited by other documents in WoS
⊙ Detail Information in WoSⓡ Click to see webofscience_button
⊙ Cited 75 items in WoS Click to see citing articles in records_button

qr_code

  • mendeley

    citeulike


rss_1.0 rss_2.0 atom_1.0