A comprehensive design methodology of organic Rankine cycles for the waste heat recovery of automotive heavy-duty diesel engines

Cited 86 time in webofscience Cited 94 time in scopus
  • Hit : 923
  • Download : 0
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAmicabile, Simoneko
dc.contributor.authorLee, Jeong-Ikko
dc.contributor.authorKum, Dongsukko
dc.date.accessioned2016-04-12T07:44:36Z-
dc.date.available2016-04-12T07:44:36Z-
dc.date.created2015-06-15-
dc.date.created2015-06-15-
dc.date.issued2015-08-
dc.identifier.citationAPPLIED THERMAL ENGINEERING, v.87, pp.574 - 585-
dc.identifier.issn1359-4311-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10203/203343-
dc.description.abstractOne of the most promising approaches to recover the waste heat from internal combustion engines is the Organic Rankine Cycle owing to its efficiency and reliability. The design optimization of ORC, however, is nontrivial because there exist many design variables and practical considerations. The present paper proposes a comprehensive design methodology to optimize the Organic Rankine Cycles (ORC) considering a wide range of design variables as well as practical aspects such as component limitations and costs. The design process is comprised of three steps: heat source selection, candidate fluid selection, and thermodynamic cycle optimization. In order to select the best waste heat source, the available energy and other practical considerations of various heat sources have been compared. Among others, the Exhaust Gas Recirculation (EGR) cooler is found to be the best heat source, and thus used for the rest of this study. Based on a systematic working fluid analysis, Ethanol, Pentane, and R245fa are selected as three candidate fluids. For the comprehensive ORC optimization, four types of cycle layouts are considered: 1) subcritical cycle without a recuperator, 2) subcritical cycle with a recuperator, 3) supercritical without a recuperator, and 4) supercritical cycle with a recuperator. Four cycle layouts coupled with three candidate fluids give a total of twelve cycle analyses. Results show that the best performance is provided by the regenerative subcritical cycle with Ethanol, while the solution with minimum capital cost is the subcritical cycles with Ethanol but without a recuperator.-
dc.languageEnglish-
dc.publisherPERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD-
dc.subjectEXHAUST HEAT-
dc.subjectOPTIMIZATION-
dc.subjectFLUIDS-
dc.titleA comprehensive design methodology of organic Rankine cycles for the waste heat recovery of automotive heavy-duty diesel engines-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.wosid000359504500058-
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-84930638061-
dc.type.rimsART-
dc.citation.volume87-
dc.citation.beginningpage574-
dc.citation.endingpage585-
dc.citation.publicationnameAPPLIED THERMAL ENGINEERING-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2015.04.034-
dc.contributor.localauthorLee, Jeong-Ik-
dc.contributor.localauthorKum, Dongsuk-
dc.contributor.nonIdAuthorAmicabile, Simone-
dc.type.journalArticleArticle-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorWaste heat recovery (WHR)-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorExhaust gas recirculation (EGR)-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorOrganic Rankine cycle (ORC)-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorInternal combustion engine (ICE)-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorWorking fluid selection-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorOptimization-
dc.subject.keywordPlusEXHAUST HEAT-
dc.subject.keywordPlusOPTIMIZATION-
dc.subject.keywordPlusFLUIDS-
Appears in Collection
NE-Journal Papers(저널논문)GT-Journal Papers(저널논문)
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
This item is cited by other documents in WoS
⊙ Detail Information in WoSⓡ Click to see webofscience_button
⊙ Cited 86 items in WoS Click to see citing articles in records_button

qr_code

  • mendeley

    citeulike


rss_1.0 rss_2.0 atom_1.0