How Informed Investors Take Advantage of Negative Information in Options and Stock Markets

Cited 6 time in webofscience Cited 5 time in scopus
  • Hit : 886
  • Download : 63
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKang, Jangkooko
dc.contributor.authorPark, Hyoung-Jinko
dc.date.accessioned2014-08-29T02:06:45Z-
dc.date.available2014-08-29T02:06:45Z-
dc.date.created2014-05-20-
dc.date.created2014-05-20-
dc.date.issued2014-06-
dc.identifier.citationJOURNAL OF FUTURES MARKETS, v.34, no.6, pp.516 - 547-
dc.identifier.issn0270-7314-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10203/188966-
dc.description.abstractWe examine whether and how investors establish positions in options when they have negative information in the U.S. markets from August 2004 to January 2009. Our empirical results show that options seem to be actively and effectively used for the exploitation of negative information. General trading volumes and bid-ask spreads of options remarkably increase like those of stocks as the short sellers increase their selling pressure. Notably, we find that the difference between a stock's traded price and its implied price from the options market reaches its peak about 2 weeks before the short sale trading activity reaches its peak. We also observe that synthetic short positions measured by this difference are preferred over OTM put positions by investors with negative information. Finally, economically significant returns based on a strategy using the difference in the traded and implied stock prices as a trading signal support our evidence. Moreover, these profits confirm the findings of the previous research which argue that options are shelters for informed investors.-
dc.languageEnglish-
dc.publisherWILEY-BLACKWELL-
dc.subjectPRICES-
dc.subjectEFFICIENCY-
dc.subjectVOLUME-
dc.subjectRETURNS-
dc.subjectFUTURES-
dc.subjectINDEX-
dc.subjectARBITRAGE-
dc.subjectQUALITY-
dc.subjectTRADERS-
dc.subjectRISK-
dc.titleHow Informed Investors Take Advantage of Negative Information in Options and Stock Markets-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.wosid000334658900003-
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-84899409864-
dc.type.rimsART-
dc.citation.volume34-
dc.citation.issue6-
dc.citation.beginningpage516-
dc.citation.endingpage547-
dc.citation.publicationnameJOURNAL OF FUTURES MARKETS-
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/fut.21651-
dc.embargo.liftdate9999-12-31-
dc.embargo.terms9999-12-31-
dc.contributor.localauthorKang, Jangkoo-
dc.contributor.nonIdAuthorPark, Hyoung-Jin-
dc.type.journalArticleArticle-
dc.subject.keywordPlusPRICES-
dc.subject.keywordPlusEFFICIENCY-
dc.subject.keywordPlusVOLUME-
dc.subject.keywordPlusRETURNS-
dc.subject.keywordPlusFUTURES-
dc.subject.keywordPlusINDEX-
dc.subject.keywordPlusARBITRAGE-
dc.subject.keywordPlusQUALITY-
dc.subject.keywordPlusTRADERS-
dc.subject.keywordPlusRISK-
Appears in Collection
MT-Journal Papers(저널논문)
Files in This Item
This item is cited by other documents in WoS
⊙ Detail Information in WoSⓡ Click to see webofscience_button
⊙ Cited 6 items in WoS Click to see citing articles in records_button

qr_code

  • mendeley

    citeulike


rss_1.0 rss_2.0 atom_1.0