Item 10203/183

Cited 36 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
  • Hit : 1147
  • Download : 986
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSung, Youngchulko
dc.contributor.authorTong, Lko
dc.contributor.authorSwami, Ako
dc.date.accessioned2007-05-18T09:22:01Z-
dc.date.available2007-05-18T09:22:01Z-
dc.date.created2012-02-06-
dc.date.created2012-02-06-
dc.date.issued2005-06-
dc.identifier.citationIEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SIGNAL PROCESSING, v.53, no.6, pp.2005 - 2017-
dc.identifier.issn1053-587X-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10203/183-
dc.description.abstractWe consider distributed detection with a large number of identical binary sensors deployed over a region where the phenomenon of interest (POI) has spatially varying signal strength. Each sensor makes a binary decision based on its own measurement, and the local decision of each sensor is sent to a fusion center using a random access protocol. The fusion center decides whether the event has occurred under a global size constraint in the Neyman-Pearson formulation. Assuming homogeneous Poisson distributed sensors, we show that the distribution of "alarmed" sensors satisfies the local asymptotic normality (LAN). We then derive an asymptotically locally most powerful (ALMP) detector optimized jointly over the fusion form and the local sensor threshold under the Poisson regime. We establish conditions on the spatial signal shape that ensure the existence of the ALMP detector. We show that the ALMP test statistic is a weighted sum of local decisions, the optimal weights being the shape of the spatial signal; the exact value of the signal strength is not required. We also derive the optimal threshold for each sensor. For the case of independent, identically distributed (iid) sensor observations, we show that the counting-based detector is also ALMP under the Poisson regime. The performance of the proposed detector is evaluated through analytic results and Monte Carlo simulations and compared with that of the counting-based detector. The effect of mismatched signal shapes is also investigated.-
dc.description.sponsorshipU.S. Office of Naval Research (ONR), U.S. Army Research Lab. (ARL)en
dc.languageEnglish-
dc.language.isoen_USen
dc.publisherIEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC-
dc.subjectNON-GAUSSIAN NOISE-
dc.subjectDISTRIBUTED DETECTION-
dc.subjectDECENTRALIZED DETECTION-
dc.subjectMULTIPLE SENSORS-
dc.subjectFUSION-
dc.subjectSIGNALS-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.wosid000229444000005-
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-20544464208-
dc.type.rimsART-
dc.citation.volume53-
dc.citation.issue6-
dc.citation.beginningpage2005-
dc.citation.endingpage2017-
dc.citation.publicationnameIEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SIGNAL PROCESSING-
dc.identifier.doi10.1109/TSP.2005.847827-
dc.contributor.localauthorSung, Youngchul-
dc.contributor.nonIdAuthorTong, L-
dc.contributor.nonIdAuthorSwami, A-
dc.type.journalArticleArticle-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorasymptotically locally most powerful (ALMP)-
dc.subject.keywordAuthordistributed detection-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorfusion rule-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorlocal asymptotic normality (LAN)-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorNeyman-Pearson criterion-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorspatial Poisson process-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorspatially varying signal-
dc.subject.keywordPlusNON-GAUSSIAN NOISE-
dc.subject.keywordPlusDISTRIBUTED DETECTION-
dc.subject.keywordPlusDECENTRALIZED DETECTION-
dc.subject.keywordPlusMULTIPLE SENSORS-
dc.subject.keywordPlusFUSION-
dc.subject.keywordPlusSIGNALS-
This item is cited by other documents in WoS
⊙ Detail Information in WoSⓡ Click to see webofscience_button
⊙ Cited 36 items in WoS Click to see citing articles in records_button

qr_code

  • mendeley

    citeulike


rss_1.0 rss_2.0 atom_1.0